Secondary funding-workflow variant · not the primary public offer

Know whether to pursue before proposal week consumes you.

For small technology firms, consultants, and research teams facing a real funding opportunity: we turn the official source, eligibility rules, existing evidence, and missing attachments into one inspectable pursue, revise, hold, or stop decision.

Open the current primary offer Read the historical scope sheet

The operating sequence

01 · SOURCE

Lock the official record

Capture the solicitation, amendments, deadline, submission channel, and source rights.

02 · QUALIFY

Test fit before drafting

Map eligibility, mandatory gates, customer problem, evidence fit, and unresolved facts.

03 · PREFLIGHT

Expose package risk

Build the attachment, dependency, authority, and blocker ledger with abstention where facts are missing.

04 · DECIDE

Leave a replayable receipt

Deliver the pursue, revise, hold, or stop recommendation with sources, boundaries, and next actions.

Why not just ask an AI?

AI can draft. ProofLock governs the decision.

A general AI can summarize a solicitation or suggest prose. It does not automatically establish which source version controls, which private facts are verified, which claims have evidence, which attachments and authorities are missing, or whether the final record can be replayed after the chat ends.

What the fee buys

A named person accountable for the agreed deliverables
Locked sources, rules, acceptance criteria, and decision owner
Abstention instead of invented facts when evidence is missing
A durable package and receipt trail your team can challenge or reuse
A measured handoff—not an unsupported promise that the package will win

You receive

Official-source and eligibility-rule register
Evidence-linked pursue / no-pursue brief
Reviewer-ready package outline
Attachment, dependency, and blocker ledger
Decision receipts and final handoff readout

You provide

One official opportunity URL or source packet
Truthful organization and eligibility facts
Existing technical evidence and prior materials
One decision owner and one primary objective
Written permission for every source we inspect

The pass condition

A buyer can trace why the opportunity should be pursued, revised, held, or stopped—and can see every material source, assumption, missing fact, attachment, and authority gate behind that decision.

If the evidence says stop, the sprint still succeeded: it prevented unsupported claims and wasted submission effort.

Safe first contact

Start with the public opportunity link—not your confidential files.

For the fit check, send the official public source, deadline, organization name, decision owner, and the decision that is blocked. Do not email credentials, financial-account details, government identity numbers, protected health information, classified/CUI or export-controlled material, privileged legal communications, or confidential technical evidence.

Before we inspect any non-public source, both parties name the approved operators, systems, external AI or service providers, retention and deletion rules, incident channel, and final disposition receipt in writing.

Review the data handling schedule Open the safe intake checklist

Included

Decision assurance and package preflight

Source reconciliation, opportunity qualification, evidence mapping, package architecture, blocker discovery, claim boundaries, and a replayable decision record.

Human-only boundary

No signatures, certifications, or final submit

The client retains all legal, tax, pricing, representation, portal, signature, upload, send, and final-submission authority. We do not invent missing facts or certify eligibility.